The Matrix: Path of Neo

Post by **Libaax** » Fri Nov 11, 2005 10:32 pm

Is it good as the commersiel makes it out to be? Has anyone played it? Is it crap as ETM?

Normally i don't think a game is good just cause of a commersiel but the thought of playing Neo and kicking ass is... mm.

Post by **Eldo** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 6:20 am

Gamespot gave it a moderately good (7.3) rating, but I think it's more of a rental than buy quality. I never really liked much movie to game conversions, there's been too few that are actually decent.

Post by **Libaax** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 3:29 pm

I just saw gamespot rating and 7.3 is pretty good for a movie game.

Im just intrested just cause you can play as Neo.

I will check reviews and decide if it worth buying. If the ratings dont go below 6 then its good for a movie game.

Post by **Femto** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 3:46 pm

You shouldn't be so lenient on a game because it's based on a movie.

If it sucks, it sucks and you won't enjoy it even if it's based on the most awesome movie ever.

Post by **Libaax** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 3:53 pm

I don't care about the actual movie but that you can play as Neo and kickass with his powers.

According to gamespot is the action part of the game pretty good.

Post by **Femto** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 3:59 pm

Playing as Neo still shouldn't warrant a purchase if the game sucks IMO.

Dante or Ryu Hayabusa are arguably cooler and star in much better games. Why settle for less just so you can play Neo?

Post by **Libaax** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:06 pm

Well the game don't suck according to the review.

I will problably buy it when its very cheap.

I wont go as far as compare Neo to Dante,Ryu i haven't played with.

Its just a fantasy to play as Neo but it isn't worth buying the game for fullprice for but maybe when its cheap and old.

Post by **Femto** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:17 pm

Yeah, waiting for a good price drop is probably your best bet.

I dislike licensed games personally.

Post by **Libaax** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:34 pm

I despise license game more than anything. They ruin the gaming world.

I have only seen one good license game that was the Riddick game.

Post by **Loeviz** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:50 pm

Well I dont think this game will be any better then "Enter the Matrix" game that came out a while back.
And the Riddick game was actually quiet enjoyable, a bit to short though

Post by **Malvado** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:07 pm

Spiderman does great linceased games. Like that one on sega and snes with spidey and venom or maybe it was just on one console.

But i want to hear what people say about path of neo. It looks nice but i don't buy action games(including devil may cry) so i'll just wait till my friend downloads it.

Post by **Tempest** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:34 pm

Malvado wrote:Spiderman does great linceased games. Like that one on sega and snes with spidey and venom or maybe it was just on one console.

You mean "Seperation Anxiety"? It was a Side Scrolling Beat'em Up and you played as Spidey and/or Venom as you try and defeat all of the symbiotes that spawned from the Venom suit. Appearances from Captain America, Hawkeye and Iron Man (Maybe) occured, as you could use them kind of like strikers in KOF 99-01 and have them help you out. It came out on the SNES too, whic his what I played it on, hence my knowledge of it.

I must say that Spider-Man is probably the exception the the crappy liscenced game rule. Ultimate Spider-Man is supposed to be really good, and I enjoyed playing the first Spidey Movie game, especially having Bruce Cambell voice the tutorial.

Post by **Starnum** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:51 pm

Yeah, "Seperation Anxiety" was the shit back in the day. Hm, when did a score of 7.3 mean a game sucks.

Post by **Libaax** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:45 pm

Thats what im saying.