
Hopefully someone will find a Gif.
Click here.....http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/vid ... Id=2378529
I would post of pic, but apparently you can't download images from their site.
http://espn.go.com/
Moderator: EG Members
Okay....I'll try and remembered that next time.War Machine wrote:If you're gonna talk about an impressive feat, you could at least show a picture.
Chill The F.....OStarnum wrote:CTFO?
Thank you!Femto wrote:
Many people are whining that the Superman Dunk should not have qualified as "dunk" based on the premise that he never touched the rim. Believe it or not this has actually become a hot topic on message boards in the sports world. Which I find sad because whether or not the Superman Dunk by "definition" was a dunk or not, takes nothing away from the feat or act in itself.hadi wrote:The reason why the superman dunk was better than the backboard dunk was the hype and atmosphere Dwight had built up to do the dunk, and did you see the way he THREW the ball into the ring! That was sick
I think you answered your own question, he had to have touched the rim for it to be considered a legitimate dunk. But in my opinion, the downward motion qualifies it as a dunk. And I agree, it's very impressive nonetheless.The Prince wrote:Second, IF throwing a ball downward through the rim isn't a dunk, than what the hell is it then? It can't be a lay-up, where by definition, throwing a ball thru the rim would be the opposite of one.
Whoa.Libaax wrote:Superman Dunk was great but the behind the basket windmill was the best.
Its good of Howard to show that the big men can also dunk great,creative dunks.
Hehe nice to you too.Femto wrote:Whoa.Libaax wrote:Superman Dunk was great but the behind the basket windmill was the best.
Its good of Howard to show that the big men can also dunk great,creative dunks.