Female President???

Website · Post by **Damien** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:13 pm

So do you think there will be one within the next 50 years or so?

Post by **Skullkracker** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:23 pm

hmmmm, it just might be
even though some will not like it

Post by **Loeviz** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:30 pm

Perhaps it might be so.
You got anyone that is like a Future candidate now to evolve the question a little? I mean they need to be old too you know so there could be one young female politician that could be choosen

Post by **ucrzymofo87** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:53 pm

i think dick morris is right about hillary vs. condi in 2008, let's wait and see...

Post by **Starnum** » Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:21 am

I doubt it, Americans hate change, and are mostly close-minded, but we'll see.

Post by **ucrzymofo87** » Tue Oct 18, 2005 4:05 pm

Starnum wrote:I doubt it, Americans hate change, and are mostly close-minded, but we'll see.

that's not a very open-minded statement, I'm an American and I'd vote for a woman, in fact, I already did for our governor.

Post by **Killfile** » Tue Oct 18, 2005 6:29 pm

Since the Dems are likely to be the focus of the primary media circus since they're the party out of power. If it seems likely that Hillary is going to get the nomination, the GOP would be fools to toss someone as controvercial as Condi into the mix. They'd be much wiser to run Guliani and play up the terrorist angle.

Hillary is a very charged figure -- and in order to seriously mobilize the GOP base, all the Republicans would have to do is run someone who's NOT Hillary. Condi isn't "unhillary" enough.

OTOH, if the GOP looks like it's going to run Condi, the best card for the Dems to play is probably Virginia Governer Mark Warner. Granted, that's a rush to the center, which I'm generally opposed too - but Warner has a real opportunity to undercut the conservitive vote. That could do a lot of damage if the GOP is allready on pins and needles over a female candidate.

Post by **Tempest** » Tue Oct 18, 2005 6:32 pm

ucrzymofo87 wrote:
Starnum wrote:I doubt it, Americans hate change, and are mostly close-minded, but we'll see.
that's not a very open-minded statement, I'm an American and I'd vote for a woman, in fact, I already did for our governor.

It's not an open-minded statment, probably because Starnum is as dissapointed in the American people as I have been for the past 2 elections. I have lost faith in about half of America after 2004, and the only thing that even resembles somthing good coming out of the tragedies in Louisiana is that people see how inept out government really is, mainly Monkey-Boy up on top.

I'd vote for a woman if she was the best candidate. I'm not just going to say, "Oh it's a woman! I have to vote for her to stick it to the years of woman's oppression!" I need to know what she is all about. A woman is governer here in Michigan, and I think she's doing an OK job so far.

Post by **Necromancer** » Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:58 pm

In germany we got our first female "president"(not really the same)/Bundeskanzler with the last votes.

Let's see how it'll work out.

And btw. yay for Lady Death.

Post by **Libaax** » Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:25 pm

Even if Hillary or another women was good enough to be prez the american people would not vote for her cause as starnum they are close minded.

I can almost say for sure thier wont be a female prez in US before atleast 30-40 years.

Post by **Starnum** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:55 am

ucrzymofo87 wrote:that's not a very open-minded statement,

Well, it's just an opinion based off of observation. I'm an American too, so I know we're not all like that. It just seems that most people in general are close-minded *shrugs*.

Post by **Sandman** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:49 pm

Hillary will run I bet you and she might win, if the Rep. cant find a good canadate.

Post by **Loeviz** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:03 pm

I bet she will win, just cause shes famous.

Website · Post by **Damien** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:50 pm

I think her being pres will bring bad things.

Post by **Starnum** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:21 am

Why do you think that?

Website · Post by **Damien** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:38 am

She goes all PTA mom, when she hears about the hot coffee thing, like she was on the rag.

I also think her being a feminist would have a bad effect on things.

Post by **Libaax** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:45 am

I rather see her being a PTA mom than a Bush copy becomes the new prez.

Post by **Starnum** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:31 am

Same here.

Post by **Sandman** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:18 pm

No Guns, no voilent Video Games, No MTV(jk), and a whole bunch of other things mom's and victims of adultery hate...cant think of any thing specific that adulteries hate besides adulterers.

Website · Post by **Damien** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:32 pm

^^ You got it right. ^^

Post by **Necromancer** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 9:14 pm

As long as it's only the USA it'll be fine with me.

Post by **Libaax** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:31 pm

Not really since USA is the power in the world.

We have seen how much damage a bad prez can do already.

Post by **Sandman** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:14 pm

Libaax wrote:We have seen how much damage a bad prez can do already.

Quoted for truth

And remeber we have more nukes

Post by **Starnum** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:08 am

Sandman wrote:No Guns, no voilent Video Games, No MTV(jk)

Yeah right, even Hillary Clinton can't get rid of those things. You've got to be realistic, the world we live in would never allow the abolishment of these things. Well, maybe MTV, it sucks anyway.

Post by **Necromancer** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:41 pm

Libaax wrote:Not really since USA is the power in the world.

We have seen how much damage a bad prez can do already.

Maybe but I don't think a video game prohibition in the USA would change anything here. And I can live without american Game Designers etc.

The european ones are better in any case.