Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 10:42 am
by Starnum
Well, for those of you who wouldn't donate any money, then you have no right to complain about others.
As for me, I would donate, as in, to my friends and family. My whole crew would be fat paid! The more money I had, the more people I would affect, so I'd make a difference.
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 10:45 am
by Arresty
Well my friends and family woudl enjoy in it. I am not that greedy, just not strangers. Then again if I was rich I may have a different opinion. Right now I wish things were cheaper and I got paid more. But don't we all. Currently my conscience's main purpose is to go "Wait. You can't afford that."
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 8:54 pm
by Eldo
Piracy did take its toll on Hong Kong. It affected the Movie industry heavily, since a bootleg was released before the movie. So the production sum was more than the profit sum.
Reason why Hollywood shouldn't complain and HK should? HK movies are directed to people confined in a tiny arse island not seen in atlases, while Hollywood is seen across the world. There's a much larger audience for Hollywood, such that if 20-50% of people does download from the net, it wouldn't affect them as heavily as HK cinema. And still they make loads of cash.
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 7:21 am
by Gaiseric
Those HK bootlegs are usually quality bootlegs too.
I wouldn't download so many HK films if they were more easily accessible here in the US.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 1:48 am
by Damien
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:47 am
by Arresty
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:36 am
by Starnum
Indeed, good stuff.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:23 am
by Buzkashi
Yes indeed it is good but not as good as this.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:53 am
by Arresty
Yes that is definately funnier. Monkeys = funny, as do midgits.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:23 am
by Luck-
Ew... Thats ugly.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:26 am
by Arresty
You know there is some actor, who I can't think of right now, but looks just like that monkey.
