Page 42 of 49
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:39 am
by halfnhalf
blah, no love for the commando?? didnt have any fun with him in MvC???

Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:31 pm
by lon3vvolf
Wow actually thats quite awesome. But it might be a lot harder to make than the others.
BTW... doesn't that pose look like Phoenix Wright?
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 6:09 pm
by Malvado
Well Phoenix Wright doesn't have his legs spread or his second hand up at all. Only the pointer and maybe his hair. Sooo you are just looking to far into things. They are both made/published by capcom anyway I think so whatever.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:47 am
by lon3vvolf
So anyone kinda excited over Tekken 6?
[youtube]ZHS9bj9t6xg[/youtube]
[youtube]NsuGgXud1tQ[/youtube]
[youtube]oY-dDGBMspw[/youtube]
I personally like how the water effects are done on the 2nd clip, and how when Jack walks on the 3rd clip, the ground kinda gives in.
In other news... I can't embed anything... such a useless noob I am.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:23 am
by Malvado
I suppose that new Capcom 2D fighter is the Sangoku Barasa one...
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:27 am
by Starnum
Meh, I haven't been worried about Tekken for a long time. Anyway, look at your post (as if you were going to edit it) to see how I embedded those for you. You just use the section after the "=" not the entire url.
{youtube}"section of url after the equal sign"{/youtube}
Something like that, basically. 
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:26 pm
by lon3vvolf
Sweet. Thanks for the edumacation lesson. Now I know, and knowing is half the battle.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:04 am
by Starnum
Hey, np.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:50 am
by Femto
Tekken sucks.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 7:20 am
by DarkenRahlX
That water effect looks like crap compared to VF5. Why do the character models in Tekken 6 look exactly like Tekken 5? It's like all of Namco Bandai's graphical talent went over to Soul Calibur 4.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:13 pm
by Ayanami
Capcom's fighter is actually going to be a crap Arc game...
Blegh.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 3:38 am
by halfnhalf
Ayanami wrote:Capcom's fighter is actually going to be a crap Arc game...
Blegh.
hoping it was gonna be SF4?
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:52 pm
by Tempest
halfnhalf wrote:
hoping it was gonna be SF4?
If Arc's going to be the ones to make it? God no.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 12:54 am
by Ayanami
I am not really all that impressed with any thing Arc has done. The style of fighting in Arc games does not sit well with me as well, so maybe I am biased. It would be awesome to play some thing new from Capcom though. Hell, I would be happy with another game that played like CVS 2, and that has probably been one of their weakest "recent" games.
Oh, and I knew it was not going to be SF4.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:11 am
by DarkenRahlX
Just saw a couple of Sengoku Basara X vids.... not impressed... and with only 10 playable characters... you'd figure the animation would be smoother.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 4:49 pm
by Tempest
DarkenRahlX wrote:Just saw a couple of Sengoku Basara X vids.... not impressed... and with only 10 playable characters... you'd figure the animation would be smoother.
You'd figure, but let's remember who's making the game: Arc "You totally can't see our shitty animation with all these hi-res flashes... can you?" Systems.
From what I saw, making the game seemed to consist of:
STEP 1: Take Hokuto No Ken's system and add Strikers
STEP 2: ?????
STEP 3: Profit.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:51 am
by Femto
Tempest wrote:DarkenRahlX wrote:Just saw a couple of Sengoku Basara X vids.... not impressed... and with only 10 playable characters... you'd figure the animation would be smoother.
You'd figure, but let's remember who's making the game: Arc "You totally can't see our shitty animation with all these hi-res flashes... can you?" Systems.
From what I saw, making the game seemed to consist of:
STEP 1: Take Hokuto No Ken's system and add Strikers
STEP 2: ?????
STEP 3: Profit.
Your attempt to shoehorn a South Park joke rip-off into this post is one of the greatest failures I've seen in this forum.
Partly because there is no step two but mainly because it just isn't funny.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:43 pm
by Tempest
Femto wrote:
Your attempt to shoehorn a South Park joke rip-off into this post is one of the greatest failures I've seen in this forum.
Partly because there is no step two but mainly because it just isn't funny.
And your attempt to simply pump up your e-penis by insulting me for no reason is undoubtably the greatest failure in this thread since it has nothing to do with fighting games, or anything at all. Or is this retaliation because I called you a girl in another thread? Jesus, when did you decide to become such a sniviling little prick?
Now in actual fighting game news/discussion, here are some YouTube VIds of Basara X:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr4TgsaQckU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM23dHSTd44
Color me unimpressed. *EDIT* The Youtube tabs didn't work for me when I looked at them in my completed, has this been an issue for anyone else?
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:06 pm
by Femto
That's Tempest, fellas.
He posts random pictures that he didn't make to speak for himself and he takes good jokes out of context and butchers them.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:26 pm
by War Machine
This is how you do it:
[youtube]Gr4TgsaQckU[/youtube]
Don't write the whole link, only the last part.
Anyway, as you said, the game is very unimpressive.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:39 pm
by DarkenRahlX
I'm going to have to admit that KOF: MIRA is the best fighting game ever made, both in graphics and gameplay. Falcoon's alternate costumes also look infinitely better than the originals.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:18 am
by Tempest
War Machine wrote:Don't write the whole link, only the last part.
Thanks, man, I knew it had to be something simple like that.
And as for you Femto, if I don't use those pictures, who will? Why should I write a lengthy and time consuming response t when somebody else already made a pretty picture out of it with words? I did make this one though, and I think it fits rather well here:

Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:35 pm
by Tempest
ZOMG Double Post.
Anywho, KOF XI is apparently being slated for release in the States on October 4th, but the only source I seem to be able to find for that is it's unreferenced Wikipedia page. Has anybody found some confirmation on this?
Also, new-ish screens from Soul Calibur 4
HERE. Between Cassandra looking like she just went out that day saying "Pants? Who the fuck needs pants?" and Voldo's Codpiece of Doom, Namco should just run with the over-emphasized sexuality and make this game into a Hentai/Sex game.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:41 am
by DarkenRahlX
I can't help but want to play this game solely because of Siegfried. Other than that... the gratuitous clothing just irks me. Seriously, I love women, but sometimes people go so far as too make character designs so sexual that it's cheesy.
Re: Fighters Discussion
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 3:05 am
by Malvado
Malvado wrote:IVy alone has sold me on Soul Calibur 4. I just wasn't interested after 2 felt inferior to SC and 3 failed even worst. Tira's new outfit sucks though and they better not touch Xianghua.
I repeat myself. Ivy alone has sold me, Sophitia has just added more to the lovely bill. Screw real women, I want beautiful warrior goddess with next-gen graphics. I mean really, they haven't even got implants same as in the other games but with super graphics (and Ivy is saggy a little instead of pointy like SC3).