Former Nazi removed from space hall of fame
Moderator: EG Members
- Killfile
- Flexing spam muscles
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 8:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg - 1917
- Contact:
Nothing could have been proven in court. Project Paperclip removed many high level Nazi scientists and utilized the knowledge they'd built upon the lives of thousands for the US space, biological weapons, and chemical weapons programs.
Nothing could be proven in court because the United States made sure it never got to court.
As I said above, it's important that we recognize that this portion of US history happened. I think he should be left in the hall of fame. I also think there should be a notice affixed to whatever information is on display noting that this man was in collusion with the Nazi government and may have preformed unspeakable acts against religious and ethnic minorities. We should also note that he was brought into the United States and spared a war crimes trial as part of Project Paperclip.
Nothing could be proven in court because the United States made sure it never got to court.
As I said above, it's important that we recognize that this portion of US history happened. I think he should be left in the hall of fame. I also think there should be a notice affixed to whatever information is on display noting that this man was in collusion with the Nazi government and may have preformed unspeakable acts against religious and ethnic minorities. We should also note that he was brought into the United States and spared a war crimes trial as part of Project Paperclip.
- vtwahoo
- Mastered PM
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:20 am
- Location: Old Town Alexandria (Temporarily)
And, to reiterate, the details of Project Paperclip remain classified. The United States continues to keep that information from the public.Killfile wrote:Nothing could be proven in court because the United States made sure it never got to court.
However many common pursuits you have, you must, in the end, find freedom even from the good intentions of those who love you.
-----Kwame Anthony Appiah, The Ethics of Identity
-----Kwame Anthony Appiah, The Ethics of Identity
vtwahoo and killfile,
are you guys reallife friends?
=)
i saw a documentary series called "space race" or "race for space" or something like that. it was by bbc i think.
anyways, it mentioned that either america smuggled these german nazi scientists(like von braun and his team) to the USA to work for them or let the soviets get a hold of them and their knowledge when germany was divided up after ww2.
are you guys reallife friends?
=)
i saw a documentary series called "space race" or "race for space" or something like that. it was by bbc i think.
anyways, it mentioned that either america smuggled these german nazi scientists(like von braun and his team) to the USA to work for them or let the soviets get a hold of them and their knowledge when germany was divided up after ww2.

They are husband and wife, so yeah, I guess you can say they are real life friends. I think you asked that question before.Quest wrote:vtwahoo and killfile,
are you guys reallife friends?
=)

I don't think half the toilet seats in the world are as clean as I should like; and only half of those are half as clean as they deserve. - tsubaimomo, July 26, 2010 3:00 am
- Brainpiercing
- Crusher of Dreams
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 9:29 pm
- Location: somewhere far beyond
A lot of people joined the Nazi party to get ahead. The same as the communist party in russia. Does that mean they condoned their ideas? Possibly not. But does that mean they opposed the Nazis actively? Definitely not.
Well, I didn't live at the time, but being German myself I believe many people were quite content with having the Nazis around because being called Herrenmensch tickled their egos.
Remember the Nazis were elected into power. They didn't come with a revolution or a coup like the communists in Russia or China. I'll grant that during the chaos of the Weimar republic having a single strong man around sounded like a great idea, but I don't quite get why there was so little resistance in Germany. People fought losing battles before, why did so few people fight losing battles against the Nazis in their own country? Even the so famed 20th July coup attempt by some high-ranking officers of the Wehrmacht only happened after finding out that the Endsieg was a dream that would never come about.
In 1933 when the Nazis were elected most of Hitler's plans were available to all readers. He had already constructed his moral universe, and published it to the world. I wonder how many people actually read his book before electing him. Most people also knew that the Nazis had been terrorising the parliament with their brown-clothed thugs called the SA. Did that stop them? No.
Too many people still believed the perceived wrong, the "backstabbing" of the treaty of Versailles, could be undone with another war. Too many people resented the weak Weimar republic so much they didn't open their eyes to whom they had just elected.
Overall I don't buy it that in post-war Germany all the Nazis were suddenly gone.
Well, I didn't live at the time, but being German myself I believe many people were quite content with having the Nazis around because being called Herrenmensch tickled their egos.
Remember the Nazis were elected into power. They didn't come with a revolution or a coup like the communists in Russia or China. I'll grant that during the chaos of the Weimar republic having a single strong man around sounded like a great idea, but I don't quite get why there was so little resistance in Germany. People fought losing battles before, why did so few people fight losing battles against the Nazis in their own country? Even the so famed 20th July coup attempt by some high-ranking officers of the Wehrmacht only happened after finding out that the Endsieg was a dream that would never come about.
In 1933 when the Nazis were elected most of Hitler's plans were available to all readers. He had already constructed his moral universe, and published it to the world. I wonder how many people actually read his book before electing him. Most people also knew that the Nazis had been terrorising the parliament with their brown-clothed thugs called the SA. Did that stop them? No.
Too many people still believed the perceived wrong, the "backstabbing" of the treaty of Versailles, could be undone with another war. Too many people resented the weak Weimar republic so much they didn't open their eyes to whom they had just elected.
Overall I don't buy it that in post-war Germany all the Nazis were suddenly gone.
There was a reason why the Allies didn't have to fight a guerilla war, if we grant general amnesty then no one really needs to fight further.
Those still faithful to the Nazi party after the Allies steamrolled into Germany where regrouping in the hills of Germany, the blood shed there could have lasted longer if the remnant fought a guerilla war against the allies.
So yes, by saying "there are no more Nazi's in Germany", you gave the people a way out and cause for more bloodshed.
That is what I took away from Western Civ II, correct me if I'm wrong.
Those still faithful to the Nazi party after the Allies steamrolled into Germany where regrouping in the hills of Germany, the blood shed there could have lasted longer if the remnant fought a guerilla war against the allies.
So yes, by saying "there are no more Nazi's in Germany", you gave the people a way out and cause for more bloodshed.
That is what I took away from Western Civ II, correct me if I'm wrong.
Last edited by psi29a on Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Wandering_Mystic
- n00b Smasher
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:37 pm
- Location: Home, home again. I like to be here when I can
- Buzkashi
- Devourer of Children
- Posts: 5727
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:23 am
- Location: Hiding from the flying beavers..
I thought it was Argentina. Along with Eichman and what not.
Last edited by Buzkashi on Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion.
-Sir Francis Bacon, Of Atheism <---Did I make this my sig? This shits gay as fuck.
-Sir Francis Bacon, Of Atheism <---Did I make this my sig? This shits gay as fuck.
- Brainpiercing
- Crusher of Dreams
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 9:29 pm
- Location: somewhere far beyond
Well, in fact there WAS nearly a general amnesty. However, while the Nazi leaders were fanatics, the general populace in Germany was never very easily aroused into breaking rules. You have to understand that even without fines people here would probably stop at a red traffic light. If there is one characteristic of the German people in history, it's their belief in authority. YES there are exceptions, but Germans generally don't go for revolutions (nor for guerilla warfare). Even the Nazi elite didn't continue fighting, those that were not convicted and hanged went into hiding quietly, and never again raised their ugly heads.
So after smashing the Nazi state the Allies could easily re-employ a good amount of the German administration and legal aparatus, because those would do after the war what they were used to doing: follow the regulations. If the law said someone had to be put to death for being a communist (or for whatever reason), well, that had to be right. Once that changed, well, that had to be right as well. The whole atrocity of the Nazi state becomes apparent when you look at how formalised it all was. The people didn't need to be fanaticised because they were firmly embedded in sets of rules and regulations. Only a minority of people were incited to riot at the beginning of the holocaust, and even then, it was like following the rules. I very much doubt many Nazis would have taken to the hills if there had been more punishment. The Nazi system was not a hydra like modern guerrilla and terrorism, which is why it is really so sad in retrospect that noone managed to cut off it's head earlier.
However, all that does not mean that people didn't sympathise with the Nazis. I'm quite sure there was more sympathy than people like to admit. Do I have a basis for this? Well, to be quite honest, not a very good one. At present, it's mostly a feeling.
So after smashing the Nazi state the Allies could easily re-employ a good amount of the German administration and legal aparatus, because those would do after the war what they were used to doing: follow the regulations. If the law said someone had to be put to death for being a communist (or for whatever reason), well, that had to be right. Once that changed, well, that had to be right as well. The whole atrocity of the Nazi state becomes apparent when you look at how formalised it all was. The people didn't need to be fanaticised because they were firmly embedded in sets of rules and regulations. Only a minority of people were incited to riot at the beginning of the holocaust, and even then, it was like following the rules. I very much doubt many Nazis would have taken to the hills if there had been more punishment. The Nazi system was not a hydra like modern guerrilla and terrorism, which is why it is really so sad in retrospect that noone managed to cut off it's head earlier.
However, all that does not mean that people didn't sympathise with the Nazis. I'm quite sure there was more sympathy than people like to admit. Do I have a basis for this? Well, to be quite honest, not a very good one. At present, it's mostly a feeling.
I'm pretty sure this is where the US generals just left the Russians to take the casulaties in their big push to be world first.psi29a wrote:There was a reason why the Allies didn't have to right a guerilla war, if we grant general amnesty then no one really needs to fight further.
Those still faithful to the Nazi party after the Allies steamrolled into Germany where regrouping in the hills of Germany, the blood shed there could have lasted longer if the remnant fought a guerilla war against the allies.
So yes, by saying "there are no more Nazi's in Germany", you gave the people a way out and cause for more bloodshed.
That is what I took away from Western Civ II, correct me if I'm wrong.
That must mean they were an upstanding and legitimate organization. They of course were fairly elected and never employed any thuggish tactics or were involved in any political scandal. Politicians are straight as an arrow (even the Nazi ones), I hope no one tries to convince me otherwise.Brainpiercing wrote: Remember the Nazis were elected into power.

- Brainpiercing
- Crusher of Dreams
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 9:29 pm
- Location: somewhere far beyond
Ok, now I'm sure you voted for Bush.Shisho wrote:That must mean they were an upstanding and legitimate organization. They of course were fairly elected and never employed any thuggish tactics or were involved in any political scandal. Politicians are straight as an arrow (even the Nazi ones), I hope no one tries to convince me otherwise.Brainpiercing wrote: Remember the Nazis were elected into power.

- Buzkashi
- Devourer of Children
- Posts: 5727
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:23 am
- Location: Hiding from the flying beavers..
Yes! Finally someone I can relate to in this board.Shisho wrote:I love Bush, he is the smartest most well spoken president we've ever had.
A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion.
-Sir Francis Bacon, Of Atheism <---Did I make this my sig? This shits gay as fuck.
-Sir Francis Bacon, Of Atheism <---Did I make this my sig? This shits gay as fuck.
- Brainpiercing
- Crusher of Dreams
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 9:29 pm
- Location: somewhere far beyond