Personally, I don't like characters to be too ordinarily human, they should be far greater/more interesting (at least in some respects) than ordinary people, or why bother reading about them? But one of the quickest ways for me to stop caring about a story is if I can't believe in the characters, if they no longer seem real to me; so they also need to stay believably human. If that makes sense.Eldo wrote:I don't know about you, but I sometimes hate it when characters in a book become too human.
I see what Grahf is trying to make here, but I don't necessarily believe that higher ranked people in the army or in parliament are robots.
Completely agree with the point about high rank not equalling robots. I think Grahf's biggest problem with the argument is that he's underestimating the crushing mental burden that a leader such as Griffith is under, and so holding him to a standard no human (except sociopaths, who wouldn't be able to lead effectively anyway because they wouldn't be able to identify with people) could meet.